![]() The tank had a 11–30 mm armour plating – prone to penetration by heavy rifles. These turrets and cannons were in a poor position, which made it near-impossible to focus fire. The crew got in and out of the tank from the hatches on the turrets. Ukraine: Has Russia Lost More Troops Than the US did in WW1 ![]() To make matters worse, the tank had a cramped interior where crew members were divided into separate compartments. As a result, it was difficult to operate or even manoeuvre in battles. However, like the Elefant, it was extremely sluggish and slow-moving. With five independently operated gun turrets, it was almost ten metres long and four metres tall. However, it served more as a symbol of power and might rather than practicality. The Russian T-35’s spectacular failure symbolises why these giant land ships don’t work. It was festooned with guns, and mechanical problems. The T-35 in the Kubinka Tank Museum, Moscow. Each needed to be on the drawing board or in total production between 1933 to 1945, thus ensuring each was involved in the war or was at least being tested at the same time.However, given that nearly all such designs proved to be failures or never reached the battlefield, it was fair to list the single worst one. Only one heavy tank is on the entire list.Without this, Germany’s Panzers would make up the vast bulk of this list. Each tank needed to reach the prototype phase at least.But with successes came many failures, ranging from poor conceptual designs to enormous unsustainable structures.įrom a wide variety of designs, here are some basic ground rules which limited our selection of ‘Worst Tank’ Over time, countless modifications and designs were tested in combat. However, among them all, tanks were perhaps the most innovative to emerge. World War Two heralded the advancement of many military practices and pieces of equipment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |